Main Article Content

Abstract

The role of the turnaround time (TAT) in the industry is a very important. It not only helps to increase the effective-ness of the working of the industry and laboratories but also helps strengthen the relationship of the customers with the industry authorities. Moreover the effective implementation of the techniques for reduction of turnaround time helps in creating a better atmosphere for the workers in the indus-try by proper time management and its utilization. Various studies have been conducted for the same. There are vari-ous tools and techniques available out there that can help cut down the total TAT in any chain process. Moreover the the reduction of TAT will itself help increase the revenue of the company. Also a new idea of using Internet of Things (IOT) in the industries can along with the systematic practice of 5S system can help further cut down the TAT.

Keywords

Turnaround Time (TAT), PDCA cycle, Thera-peutic TAT, 5S system

Article Details

How to Cite
[1]
Aniket Sanjay Shitole, “IMPORTANCE OF TURNAROUND TIME IN INDUSTRIAL PROCESS AND INNOVATIVE IDEAS TO REDUCE IT”, IEJRD - International Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 5, no. 5, p. 5, Jun. 2020.

References

  1. Bo Bergman and Bengt Klefsjo,¨ Quality from cus-tomer needs to customer satisfaction, Studentlitteratur AB, 2010.
  2. Accessed on 18 March 2011, ,” https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ Turnaroundtime .
  3. Hara P Pati and Gurmeet Singh, “Turnaround time (tat): difference in concept for laboratory and clini-cian,” Indian Journal of Hematology and Blood Trans-fusion, vol. 30, no. 2, pp. 81–84, 2014.
  4. Kiran P Chauhan, Amit P Trivedi, Dharmik Patel, Bhakti Gami, and N Haridas, “Monitoring and root cause analysis of clinical biochemistry turn around time at an academic hospital,” Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 29, no. 4, pp. 505–509, 2014.
  5. Binita Goswami, Bhawna Singh, Ranjna Chawla, VK Gupta, and V Mallika, “Turn around time (tat) as a benchmark of laboratory performance,” Indian Journal of Clinical Biochemistry, vol. 25, no. 4, pp. 376–379, 2010.
  6. Joan H Howanitz and Peter J Howanitz, “Laboratory results: timeliness as a quality attribute and strategy,” American Journal of Clinical Pathology, vol. 116, no. 3, pp. 311–315, 2001.
  7. Lee H Hilborne, Robert K Oye, Joseph E Mcardle, Jeff A Repinski, and Denis O Rodgerson, “Evaluation of stat and routine turnaround times as a component of laboratory quality,” American journal of clinical pathology, vol. 91, no. 3, pp. 331–335, 1989.
  8. Biswajit Dey, Jyotsna Naresh Bharti, and Montosh Chakraborty, “Laboratory turnaround time,” Interna-tional Journal of Health Sciences and Research, vol. 3, no. 5, pp. 1–4, 2013.
  9. Robert C Hawkins, “Laboratory turnaround time,” The Clinical Biochemist Reviews, vol. 28, no. 4, pp. 179, 2007.
  10. Steven J Steindel and Peter J Howanitz, “Physician satisfaction and emergency department laboratory test turnaround time: observations based on college of american pathologists q-probes studies,” Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine, vol. 125, no. 7, pp. 863–871, 2001.
  11. R. Jagadeesh, “Reduction of turnaround time for out-bound logistics ( finished goods only ) in a food pro-cessing industry kushal parwani,” 2015.
  12. Tetsuichi Asaka and Kazuo Ozeki, Handbook of qual-ity tools, the Japanese approach, Productivity Press, 1990.
  13. Bruce A Jones, Leonas G Bekeris, Raouf E Nakhleh, Molly K Walsh, and Paul N Valenstein“Physician satisfaction with clinical laboratory services: a college of american pathologists q-probes study of 138 institu-tions,” Archives of pathology & laboratory medicine, vol. 133, no. 1, pp. 38–43, 2009.