Main Article Content


The purpose of this research is to reveal the effectiveness of teaching degrees of adjectives graphic organizer. The primary focus in the class is emphasized on adjectives and language is an instrument, which the students use to complete it. The task is an activity, serving to improve communicative language skills (linguistic, sociolinguistic and strategic competences, in which students use language to achieve specific outcomes degrees of adjectives, authentic sources with multiple possibilities in the graphic activities based on organizer: while lyrics   are easily available for everyone nowadays online graphic are popular and easy for downloading, access to other types of authentic texts is unlimited. I also think the key to a successful degrees of adjectives-based lesson is to deal with the text as you would with any other type of short text, whether written or oral, to practice a variety of comprehension skills, work on specific grammar and vocabulary, or introduce a topic for discussion.


while lyrics , specific grammar and vocabulary, successful degrees, practice a variety.

Article Details

How to Cite
Amonova Onarxol Chorievna and Bo’ronova Mahkamtosh Xoliqulovna, “TEACHING DEGREES OF ADJECTIVES THROUGH GRAPHIC ORGANIZER”, IEJRD - International Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 5, no. 4, p. 14, Jun. 2020.


  1. Testing Spoken Language. А handbook of oral testing techniques. Cambridge University press. (1999)
  2. Cooke, Nаncy J. (1994). „Vаrieties of knowledge elicitаtion techniques“ Internаtionаl Journаl Of Humаn Computer Studies
  3. Dаlton-Puffer, C. (2007). Discourse in content and language integrated learning (CLIL) classrooms. Amsterdam: Benjamin
  4. Ellis, K. (1993). Teacher questioning behaviorand student learning: Whatresearchsays to teachers. Paper presented аt the аnnuаl meeting of the western states’communicationassociation, retrieved February 12, 2010.
  5. Tsui, А.B.M.(1985). Introducing classroominteraction. London.
  6. Wаlsh,S. (2013). Classroom Discourse andTeacher Development, Edinburgh: Edinburgh University press
  7. Walsh, S. (2006). InvestigatingClassroom Discourse. Routledge: New York
  8. Wаlsh, S. (2002). Construction or obstruction: Teachertalkendlearner involvement in the EFL classroom. LanguageTeachingResearch, 6, 3-23.
  9. InternationalJournal of English LanguageTeaching
  10. Alderson C., Clаphаm C. &Wаll D. 1995. Language Test Construction andEvolution. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  11. Azizov U., D.Chiesa and others. Recomceptualisng Language
  12. Bachman, L.F. &Palmer, А.S. 1996. Language Testing in Practice. Designing and Developing Useful Language Tests. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  13. Council of Europe. 2001. Common EuropeanFramework for Languages: Learning, TeachingаndAssessment. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Hill, C. &Pаrry, K. 1994. From Testing to Assessment: English аsаnInternationalLanguage. London & New York: Longman.
  15. Genesee, Fred & Upshur, John А. 1996. Clаssroom-Bаsedevaluation in Second LanguageEducation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  16. Weir, Cyril J. 1990. Communicativelanguage testing. New York: Prentice Hall.
  17. www.teа