THE SIGNIFICANCE OF MODERN AND TRADITIONAL TEACHING METHODS IN EDUCATION SYSTEM

Abstract View PDF Download PDF

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Abdumalikova Fotima Abdumutalib qizi

Abstract

Education is based on the foundations of the nation. Providing knowledge to generations, consolidating their future, inspiring them to incarnate benevolence and esteem splendor, valor and good principles has been one of the oldest professions of mankind, the noblest and the most difficult tasks. It is very significant that nowadays schools have been subject of this paper. Traditional methods consider teachers as the center of the teaching process; as well as managers and the main and referential source of the scientific information. Novelties in the teaching-learning methods applied by Western Schools focus on student centered teaching; they create a variety of situations in which students evolve critical thinking. These methods have been acquired by teachers but, in the conclusions of our paper we noticed that, occasionally, they applied traditional teaching methods (especially in the scientific subjects). There is still space and worth for discussion regarding traditional teaching methods versus the modern ones. Various scholars have considered traditional teaching as the method developing theoretical thinking, whereas modern teaching develops practical skills, pragmatist and able to be oriented to the frenetic development of the world. This paper and its conclusions can be considered interesting since confrontation of ideas regarding teaching methods remains a challenge for all teachers.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
[1]
Abdumalikova Fotima Abdumutalib qizi, “THE SIGNIFICANCE OF MODERN AND TRADITIONAL TEACHING METHODS IN EDUCATION SYSTEM”, IEJRD - International Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 6, no. 6, p. 7, Dec. 2021.

References

  1. Rogers, C.R. Carl Rogers on personal power. New York: Dell Publishing Co., Inc.; 1977.
  2. Garry Jacobs. Overcoming the Educational Time Warp: Anticipating a Different Future. CADMUS. New perspectives on major global issues. Volume 2, Issue 5: The Risk Institute; 2015.
  3. Pete Sharma. Blended Learning. ELT Journal: Oxford University Press; 2010.
  4. Rogers, C. R. Client-centered therapy: It is current practice, implications and theory. Boston: Houghton Mifflin; 1951.
  5. Renate Motschnig-Pitrik, Antonio M. Santos. The Person Centered Approach to Teaching and Learning as Exemplified in a Course in Organizational Development. ZFHE Jg.1 / Nr.4 (Dec. 2006).
  6. http://www.zfhe.at/index.php/zfhe/article/download/117/164
  7. Janani Harish. Contextual education. CADMUS. New perspectives on major global issues. Volume 2, Issue 5: The Risk Institute; 2015.
  8. Narimanova J.Y. Raising EFL Students‟ Intercultural Communication through Short Stories. International Journal of Academic Pedagogical Research (IJAPR). ISSN: 2643-9603. Vol. 4, Issue 7, July – 2020, Pages: 24-32.
  9. Rolf Johansson. Case Study Methodology. International Conference “Methodologies in Housing Research” organized by the Royal Institute of Technology in cooperation with the International Association of People– Environment Studies, Stockholm, 22–24 September 2003.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.