BEHAVIOUR OF ARCHITECTURALLY IRREGULAR BUILDING
Keywords:
Architecturally Irregular structure, vertical irregularity, setback.Abstract
Architecturally Irregular buildings like setback buildings are characterized by staggered abrupt reductions in floor area along the height of the building, with consequent drops in mass, strength and stiffness. Height-wise changes in stiffness and mass render the dynamic characteristics of these buildings different from the ‘regular’ building. The increasing number of damage after seismic ground motion has provided strong evidence that setback buildings exhibit inadequate behavior though they were designed according to the current seismic codes. Many investigations have been performed to understand the behavior of irregular structures as well as setback structures and to ascertain method of improving their performance. So, there is a need to study the seismic performance of setback structures designed by recent codes the adequacy of current seismic design requirements for setback buildings, and new design methods to improve the seismic response of setback buildings. It is possible to evaluate the seismic performance of setback building accurately using STAAD. Pro. Software. It is instructive to study the performance of static equivalent analysis methodology as well as other alternative methodologies for setback buildings and to suggest improvements suitable for setback buildings. After study all models in details it is concluded that consideration of the revised seismic codes provisions for geometric vertical irregularities seems to be essential to stipulate more restrictive limits or apply more accurate analytical procedures to predict the seismic performance of setback structures under the seismic excitations, especially for structures with critical setback ratios.
Downloads
References
Huanjun Jiang et. al (2021), “Seismic performance of RC frame-shear wall structures with vertical setback”, Institution of Structural Engineers, 2352-0124/
H. Shakib et. al. (2019), “Probabilistic Seismic Performance Assessment of Setback Buildings under Bidirectional Excitation”, Journal of structural engineers, 2345-2399
Muhammad Ammar Ayub, (2018), “Damage assessment of deficient reinforced concrete setback structures”, Structures and Buildings ISSN 0965-0911 | E-ISSN 1751-7702
Rakesh Sakale et al (2014), “Seismic Behavior of Buildings Having Horizontal Irregularities”, Int. J. Struct. & Civil Engg. Vol-3, no 4
Pradip Sarkar, A. Meher Prasad, Devdas Menon, (2010) “Vertical geometric irregularity in stepped building frame” 15 March 2010
G. Uva, F. Porco, A. Fiore (2011), “Appraisal of masonry infill walls effect in the seismic response of RC framed buildings: A case “-1 August 2011
D.Hatzigeorgiou et al (2010), “Nonlinear behavior of RC frames under repeated strong ground motions George” Soil and dynamics engineering, vol 30, 1010-1025
C.J. Athanassiadou (2007) Seismic performance of R/C plane frames irregular in elevation
Juan C. De la Llera et al (1996), “Inelastic behaviour of asymmetric multi-storey building. Journal of Structural Engineering”, Vol. 122, No.6, ASCE
Sharon L, Wood et al. (1992) “Seismic response for R.C. Frames with irregular Profiles”, Journal of Structural Engineering, Vol. 118, No. 2.
. Humar, J. L., and Wright, E. W. (1977). "Eathquake response of steel-framed multistory buildings with setbacks." Earthquake Engrg. and Struct. Dynamics, 5(1), 15-39.
Jhaveri, D. P. (1967). "Earthquake forces in tall buildings with setbacks." Thesis presented to the University of Michigan, at Ann Arbor, Mich., in partial fulfillment of the requirements for the degree of Doctor of Philosophy.
Kannan, A. E., and Powell, G. H. (1973). "DRAIN-2D: A general purpose computer program for dynamic analysis of inelastic plane structures." Report No. UCB/ EERC-73/6, Earthquake Engrg. Res. Ctr., Univ. of California, Berkeley, Calif.,Apr.
Korkut, K. (1984). "Research on the seismic behavior of structures with mass concentrations or with variable width." Bauingenieur, 59, 235-241.
Pekau, O. A., and Green, R. (1974). "Inelastic structures with setbacks." Proc, Fifth World Conf. on Earthquake Engrg., 2, Rome, Italy, 1744-1747.
Penzien, J. (1969). "Earthquake response of irregularly shaped buildings." Proc, Fourth World Conf. on Earthquake Engrg., n, Session A3, Santiago, Chile, Jan., 75-89.
Penzien, J., and Chopra, A. K. (1965). "Earthquake response of appendage on a multi-story building." Proc, Third World Conf. on Earthquake Engrg., II, New Zealand, 476-486.
Shahrooz, B. M., and Moehle, J. P. (1989). "Evaluation of seismic performance of reinforced concrete frame." J. Struct. Engrg., ASCE, 116(5), 1402-1421.
Shahrooz, B. M., and Moehle, J. P. (1987). "Experimental study of seismic response of R.C. setback buildings." Report No. UCB/EERC-87/16, Earthquake
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 IEJRD
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.