A NEW LINGUISTIC VIEW TO POLITITENESS STRATEGY
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##
Downloads
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##
Abstract
The purpose of this work is to move towards a new definition of politeness strategy. No wonder, as Brown argues, politeness "[...] is the most obvious manifestation of life and social interaction of people, the linguistic trait that reveals most of all the nature of human communication is clear."So after looking at the different concepts of this as suggested by different authors, it should be relevant to start with the definitions suggested by Bow Franch and Garces Conejos (2003), Brown (2000) and Garces Conejos (1995), and Sperber (1997) over different types of beliefs which consists of human knowledge to develop a sentence on the knowledge structures on which politeness strategy is based.
##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License.
References
- ARNDT, H.; R. W. JANNEY (1985): «Politeness Revisited: Cross-Modal Supportive Strategies», International Review of Applied Linguistics in Language Teaching, 23: 281-300
- BLUM-KULKA, S. (1992): «The Metapragmatics of Politeness in Israeli Society», en WATTS, R. J.; S. IDE; K. EHLICH (eds.) (1992): Politeness in Language: Studies in Its History, Theory and Practice. Berlin, Mouton de Gruyter. 255-279.
- BOU FRANCH, P.; P. GARCÉS CONEJOS (2003): «Teaching Linguistic Politeness : A Methodological Approach», IRAL, 41: 1-22.
- BROWN, P. (2000): «How and Why Are Women More Polite: Some Evidence from a Mayan Community», en COATES J. (ed.) (2000): Language and Gender. A Reader. Oxford, Blackwell. 81-99.
- EELEN, G. (2001): A Critique of Politeness Theories, Manchester, St. Jerome Publishing HLICH, K. (1992): «On the Historicity of Politeness», en WATTS, R.; S. IDE; K. EHLICH (eds.) 71-107.
- ESCANDELL VIDAL, M. V. (1996 a): Introducción a la Pragmática, Barcelona, Ariel. (1996 b): «Towards a Cognitive Approach to Politeness», Language Sciences, 18:629-650.
- FRASER, B. (1990): «Perspectives on Politeness», Journal of Pragmatics, 14: 219-236. GARCÉS CONEJOS, P. (1995): «Revisión crítica de algunos de los postulados de la teoríade la cortesía lingüística propugnada por Brown y Levinson», Quaderns de Filologia:Estudis Lingüistics, 1: 43-61.
- GRICE, H. P. (1975): «Logic and conversation», en COLE, P.; J. MORGAN (eds.) (1975): Syntax and Semantics. Vol. 3: Speech Acts. New York, Academic Press. 41-59.
- GU, Y. (1990): «Politeness Phenomena in Modern Chinese», Journal of Pragmatics, 14: 237-257.
- HILL, B.; S. IDE; S. IKUTA; A. KAWASAKI; T. OGINO (1986): «Universals of Linguistic Politeness. Quantitative Evidence from Japanese and American English», Journal of Pragmatics, 10: 347-371.
- IDE, S. (1982): «Japanese Sociolinguistics Politeness and Women’s Language», Lingua, 57: 57-385.
- ZIMMIN, S. (1981): «Sex and Politeness: Factors in First and Second Language Use», International Journal of the Sociology of Language, 27: 35-58.