STYLISTIC ANALYSIS OF THEODORE ROETHKE’S POEM DOLOUR

Abstract View PDF Download PDF

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Ravinder Gargesh

Abstract

The article studies the stylistic analysis of Theodore Roethke’s Poem Dolour through phonological, lexical,  semantic-pragmatical level

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
[1]
Ravinder Gargesh, “STYLISTIC ANALYSIS OF THEODORE ROETHKE’S POEM DOLOUR”, IEJRD - International Multidisciplinary Journal, vol. 6, no. TITFL, pp. 11–20, Apr. 2021.

References

  1. Attridge, D. 1981. The Language of poetry: Materiality and meaning. Essays in Criticism 31.3: 228-245.
  2. Barthes, R. 1967. Elements of Semiology. London: Jonathan cape.
  3. Borev, Y. 1985. Aesthetics: A textbook. Moscow: Progress Publishers.
  4. Burke, M. (ed) 2017. The Routledge Handbook of Stylistics. London: Routledge, Taylor & Francis.
  5. Enkvist, N.E. 1971. Linguistic Stylistics. The Hague: Mouton.
  6. Jeffries, L & McIntyre, D. 2010. Stylistics (Cambridge Textbooks in Linguistics). London: Camb. Univ. Press.
  7. Gargesh, R. 1990. Linguistic perspective of Literary Style. Delhi: Publication Division, University of Delhi.
  8. Jakobson, R. 1960. Linguistics and Poetics: Closing statement. In T.A. Sebeok (ed) Style in Language. Camb. Mass.: MIT Press. (pp. 350-377).
  9. Leech, G.N. 1969. A linguistic guide to English poetry. London: Longman.
  10. Saussure, F. de 1974. Course in general linguistics. London: Fontana.
  11. Srivastava, R.N. 1980. Lingua-aesthetic approach to Art symbol. Papers in Linguistics 3: 55-70.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

Obs.: This plugin requires at least one statistics/report plugin to be enabled. If your statistics plugins provide more than one metric then please also select a main metric on the admin's site settings page and/or on the journal manager's settings pages.